“For the most part, the bots are trained to act as players in the game, which means they might turn the tables and ask you if you’re a human,” says Meron.Īnd so it becomes a game of double-bluff. Courtesy Tomipelegrin, CC BY-SA 4.0/Wikimedia Commons He and his team did everything they could to make the AI in Human or Not? as convincing as possible, even down to the typos it deliberately makes, the rude words it uses, the pauses before it responds – as if it’s thinking – or its capacity to lose interest half-way through and abandon the chat, like a bored teenager.ĬhatGPT’s stiff formality and groveling apologies were never going to cut it, so they had to teach AI to be “normal.” Alan Turing in 1935. “I created the game and I don’t have a perfect strike rate,” he’s happy to admit to NoCamels. It even fooled Amos Meron, the guy who invented it. I didn’t think it would fool me, but it did. It’s a fun game with a serious purpose – to show how far artificial intelligence has advanced. Users have two minutes to decide whether they’re chatting with a human or an AI bot. Users have to decide whether they’ve been chatting with another user or with an AI bot (software program).
0 kommentar(er)
